> Ah ok, so its just like all these men from third world countries whose rape, assault, pedophilic cases dont get acknowleged
Is the UK and USA third worlds now? Once again, you can not akcnowledge someone for a crime when their demographic is literally legally exempt from being collectively held accountable for it.
> Radfem is still necessary in a lot of countries and it will never not be.
Umm no we need legal reform were abuse eis a use no matter the perpetrator, that any and all accusations of abuse are compulsively put under investigation legally and victims can sue cops and police stations that shame them form reporting.
Not a grifting movement that gets caught with far-righters and slimy republicans since ether lost the sex wars in the 80s because no one in the left or morals wants to give them a platform.
> Radical feminism also doesnt deny female perpetuators
I don't give a fuck about whatever authors that made your stupid theories and manifestos y'all have that get exposed for being pedophiles themselves like Dworkin say about "WhAt We StAnD FoR" when hundreds of you will literally say a female pedophile with biological children that escaped ring convicted for sexually abusing children together with her husband while he did get convicted can't be a female because she's not feminine and fuckable enough for yalls taste
You got caught in your stupidity, you are using a flawed systems that picks and choose who gets doesn't get arrested for abusing people based on what is between their legs, which is then used to create biased stats that are flawed front the get go when there more than 200 independent studies that have found men and women are equally abusive toward each other, something that Eryn Presley the founder of the very first domestic violence shelter in the world knew was a reality.
You then use flawed biased stats to ASSUME with zero proof that is the actual case that every single arrested female must actually be trans, you at using "the air conditioner in the car is on when the car is running so therefore all cars can only run when their air-conditioning is on" rational, when it has been constantly inadvertently been proven by radfem trying and failing to prove themselves right that the UK government actually differentiates between biological females and transwomen.
You are a dishonest and delusional woman that thinks 200 is bigger than 2k and wants to use than as proof that 200 is actually 900 and can't even notice your grifting against trans predators exists to apologize and ignore female ones.
I have zero interest in arguing with someone who's so desperate to apologize females predators and erase them from existence because their only claim to the worth of their own existence and pride is their genitalia, the UK differentiates between trans and bio women, if the news fails to do so complain to them not us, a child has more chances of being molested by their biological mother than their trans friend, 200 is not bigger than 2000 and 2+2=4.
Once again, radfems be like *suffers functional illiteracy and blames others for it*
